Hello! But I am. It is better that we fix these numerous bugs and probably does reorganize the code at the same time; then allowing this to persist and probably explode into a mess that causes undo upset to a user who's got no idea as to how to fix it if he can.
Just like I am not comfortable with people persisting in posting their messages to this list using a so called digital signature file, and causing a nuisance amongst us who run primitive scanning tools who mistake it for a binary thing behind the viruses. (Those same messages also arrive in ugly UTF-7 or UTF-8 as well.) -- Gregg C Levine hansolofal...@worldnet.att.net "The Force will be with you always." Obi-Wan Kenobi > -----Original Message----- > From: grub-devel-bounces+hansolofalcon=worldnet.att....@gnu.org [mailto:grub-devel- > bounces+hansolofalcon=worldnet.att....@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Pavel Roskin > Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 8:05 PM > To: The development of GRUB 2 > Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix chainloding + Chainloading into logical partitions > > On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 00:18 +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: > > > There is strictly no need to do this restructuration. The real bug is > > different fix would be setting dev->disk->partition to 0 before > > calling grub_disk_read and restoring it afterwards. This part of code > > is changed anyway with my nested partition patch and I was hoping it > > could be applied quickly. Could you test nestpart branch of my > > repository? > > I'm not comfortable to approve a 60k long patch that reorganizes the > code and fixed numerous bugs in the same time. I'm sure bugs can be > fixed separately. > > -- > Regards, > Pavel Roskin _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
