Le ven. 6 mars 2020 à 12:38, Javier Martinez Canillas <javi...@redhat.com>
a écrit :
> Hello Vladimir,
>
> Thanks a lot for your feedback.
>
> On 3/5/20 3:22 PM, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> > Please evaluate size increase for this. In the past passing file and line
> > number to grub_dprintf was a huge source of increased Kern and core size
> >
> > Le mer. 4 mars 2020 à 13:01, Javier Martinez Canillas <
> javi...@redhat.com>
> > a écrit :
> >
>
> For a x86_64-pc build with platform=pc on master with and without the
> patch:
>
> $ find -regex '.*\(mod\|img\|exec\)$' -exec du -c {} + | grep total$
> 2740 total
>
> $ find -regex '.*\(mod\|img\|exec\)$' -exec du -c {} + | grep total$
> 2756 total
>
> so in this case the increase is a 0.6% in size.
>
This is not the comparison we care about. We care about kernel.img size and
core.img size for several common configs. And in bytes.
We have only 31K in mbr gap and every byte counts
_______________________________________________
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
