Le ven. 6 mars 2020 à 13:43, Daniel Kiper <dki...@net-space.pl> a écrit :

> Re-adding grub-devel@gnu.org...
>
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 12:44:05PM +0100, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
> wrote:
> > Le ven. 6 mars 2020 à 12:42, Daniel Kiper <dki...@net-space.pl> a écrit
> :
> >
> > > On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 03:22:31PM +0100, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
> > > wrote:
> > > > Please evaluate size increase for this. In the past passing file and
> line
> > > > number to grub_dprintf was a huge source of increased Kern and core
> size
> > >
> > > I think it does not matter much if we stop pretending that we support
> > > small MBR gaps right now [1]. Does it?
> > >
> > There are still a lot of installations that used older tools and never
> > reformatted. We still care about them
>
> If we go that way then we have to care about them by the end of the
> universe. And this means more and more issues like [1]. If somebody
> wants to use new GRUB then he/she have to reinstall the machine or
> something like that. IMO we should not care about users who do not want
> upgrade their machines or whatnot. Or at least their choices cannot
> impact GRUB development too much. And I think that this MBR constraint
> is hindering the project too much at this point. So, as above...
>
> Sorry for being blunt...
>
It does not. Core doesn't need to have everything and the kitchen sink.
It's small by design.

>
> Daniel
>
> [1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2019-11/msg00025.html
>
_______________________________________________
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel

Reply via email to