Hello Nikolaus, > Well, this will give 99% of the time false positives, at least initially.
yes, indeed! That is called apprentice's due. Or a German word translated in English: If you do planing, you'll produce shavings. > My key argument is that it may not be possible to learn by trial and error how to distinguish > because the distinguishing information is missing... Here's a little difference between us both: I know exactly for what I'm searching for. But no more comment to this. > To give a specific example: how can a current consumption detector or RF activity measurement distinguish > between a cell handover which leaks 2-3 bytes private data from one without sending that. IMHO, a good > detector should be able to report exactly that. In this case you need some completely different detectors, located additionally outside of the phone. But no more comment. > Therefore I believe (yes it is also a believe :-) more in encryption technology than the extra hardware planned for the Neo900. This believe is not justified. We all know Moore’s law. As long as this is still valid, everything that will be encrypted today can be decrypted later. > On the other hand, what Outlook does the Linux kernel have? Regularly fixed release dates! Never underestimate this! I talked about synchronizing individual fun experiences. OpenMoko / QtMoko: Thank you for your detailed history lesson! Best regards Sven
_______________________________________________ Gta04-owner mailing list Gta04-owner@goldelico.com http://lists.goldelico.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/gta04-owner
