On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 2:26 PM, <pwie...@trychlos.org> wrote: > As I considered this rather as a waste of efforts, I am currently > trying to suppress this GSList as the GtkTreeModel is actually all > I need to manage all edition operations. But in this mode, the object > reference has to be owned by the row. > > My problem is when the row is deleted. The only option I have found is : > 1/ first retrieve the object attached to the row, and g_object_unref() it, > 2/ only after that, ask the tree model to delete the row > > This is not very elegant, especially in a event-oriented environment. > E.g., when emptying the view, I have first to walk through all the tree, > g_object_unref-ing all objects, before being able to call > gtk_tree_store_clear().
I don't fully get the problem you are describing. If I understand it correctly, you have a tree model where each node points to a GObject. Isn't it the case that when a row is destroyed that contains a G_TYPE_OBJECT column, this will unref the value in that column? > PS: if there is no other solution, don't you think that adding a > gtk_tree_model_row_about_to_delete() before each g_node_destroy() > could do the trick in a future version ? That said, yes the current row-deleted signal has its issues and in a future version we will certainly be adding a "pre-row-deleted" signal of some sort. regards, -kris. _______________________________________________ gtk-app-devel-list mailing list gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list
