> Years ago my text retrieval package had an option to call free() for all > the data structures on exit, basically just for debugging. It made the > programs often go really slow when they exited - adding tens of seconds > wasn't uncommon.
Maybe there are corner cases (although the platforms GTK can run on are pretty modern nowadays). But as someone we all know once said "premature optimization is the root of all evil". Those cases are definitely exceptions. Optimizing cleanup routines is definitely something I don't hear about much. > So, I agree it's a good idea to do (and as I mentioned, I've done it > myself in the past) but it's for sure not a case of adding one simple > line of O(1) code... I'm not sure about malloc()/free() implementations but I'm pretty sure they can use a (partial) lookup table bringing the complexity quite close to O(1). I would be appalled if I found modern implementations to be subpar. But, as I've said above, one should only consider looking at this from the efficiency point of view when you pin-point that part of the program as wasting too many cycles, especially compared to other parts of the program (how much does gtk_init() take, is that any kind of problem and could gtk_cleanup() take longer?). _______________________________________________ gtk-app-devel-list mailing list gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list
