-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Tim Janik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> could people please speak up if they think depending on C99 would
> be a bad idea for glib & gtk+ (e.g. with the next major release) and
> why this would be a problem for them?
Personally, I think it's a great idea. All my application code for
the last two years has required C99, so it would benefit me no end.
If you do this, you might want to pick up my AC_PROG_CC_C99 macro from
Autoconf CVS (it's not in a stable release yet, AFAIK).
Regards,
Roger
- --
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8+ <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
iD8DBQFDvUplVcFcaSW/uEgRAgqJAKCnLlv+qSBDwbvU5Bcm1XnInJdanwCgiQ/e
UyH104/HnR/OERrvO3qi1YA=
=pFFM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
gtk-devel-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
