* Owen Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: <snip>
> - Is the total size of Pango + modules large? No. For low memory systems (ie embedded): Yes. > - Are the modules frequently updated without changes to the > main part of Pango? No. This way you could legitimate the whole GNOME stuff in one package. Yes, X has been so, but this has been proven as hard to maintain, and so it's now modular :) > - Are Pango and the modules separately maintained? Not really. Of course not, its one package. > I can't see any possible reason that we'd want to make people's > life miserable that way. What people exactly ? For me, as an Sysop w/ dozens of different and very individual configurations (mostly embedded) it would become much, much easier. cu -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce: http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions: rsync://sources.metux.de/metux-patches --------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
