On 02.03.2007 22:49, Jake Goulding wrote: >On 02.03.2007 22:29, Tor Lillqvist wrote: >> The tests don't necessarily test everything, but this does indeed >> sound promising. >> > Well, I didn't say that I *did* run them and get good outputs, I just > wanted to make sure that was what the expected behavior was. :-) > However, I have run the majority of them. Unfortunately there are a few > that require inputs and I am clueless as to what they need to run. > Most have passed, but spawn-test seems to freak out on me. I am checking > to see if I can figure that out. > There may be trouble with the process id passed between lib and spawn-helper. The GPid definition was added with win64 in mind but not tested at that time. It probably needs to be an int64 there.
> There are whole piles of warnings about signed/unsigned comparisons and > type size issues: > > warning C4311: 'type cast' : pointer truncation from 'gpointer' to 'long' You should probably look at these. > warning C4018: '<' : signed/unsigned mismatch these are not win64 specific and probably harmless > warning C4267: 'function' : conversion from 'size_t' to 'gssize', > possible loss of data Sounds like a bug in your configuration. IIRC gssize should match the size of size_t, both 64 bits in this case. > warning C4090: 'initializing' : different 'const' qualifiers > could be ignored unless there is something supicious in its area. > I'm not sure which warnings are ignorable, and which are not. > Personally, I'm quite pedantic about my own code, and like to fix > everything, but I know that's not always feasible. > I think a series of patches to fix these warnings would be gladly accepted. Hans -------- Hans "at" Breuer "dot" Org ----------- Tell me what you need, and I'll tell you how to get along without it. -- Dilbert _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list