On Thu, 15 Mar 2007, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote: > On 3/14/07, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On 3/14/07, Tim Janik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > On Wed, 14 Mar 2007, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote: >> > > Should we send patches to this list I suppose? >> > >> > for the moment, yes. >> > and please let us know if you already have commit access or not. >> >> I was worried that some developers would complain about html patches >> dirtying the list, but then thanks if you'll look and commit the >> patches since I don't have commit rights. > > * There's 3 directories in svn (branches, tags, trunk), and it seems > only 'trunk' should be kept since the others are horribly outdated (~5 > years) and just duplicate info of each other and that of 'trunk'. > Could someone remove them since I don't see their use.
no, that's simply the versioning scheme svn uses, you can read up on that here: http://svnbook.red-bean.com/nightly/en/svn-book.html simply use: http://svn.gnome.org/svn/gtk-web/trunk/ and forget about the rest. > * I don't know too much how web technologies work but I expected that > if I open trunk/index.html I should see a page similar to that found > in www.gtk.org, but in svn's html, there's no left-hand table and no > pictures for example. server side includes: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/de/howto/ssi.html > * I see www.gtk.org (dated Dec 2006) hasn't been updated to latest svn > (dated Jan 2007). yes, that's because our scripts still need to be moved to SVN. working on that. --- ciaoTJ _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list