On Thu, 15 Mar 2007, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> On 3/14/07, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 3/14/07, Tim Janik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On Wed, 14 Mar 2007, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
>> > > Should we send patches to this list I suppose?
>> >
>> > for the moment, yes.
>> > and please let us know if you already have commit access or not.
>>
>> I was worried that some developers would complain about html patches
>> dirtying the list, but then thanks if you'll look and commit the
>> patches since I don't have commit rights.
>
> * There's 3 directories in svn (branches, tags, trunk), and it seems
> only 'trunk' should be kept since the others are horribly outdated (~5
> years) and just duplicate info of each other and that of 'trunk'.
> Could someone remove them since I don't see their use.
no, that's simply the versioning scheme svn uses, you can read up
on that here:
http://svnbook.red-bean.com/nightly/en/svn-book.html
simply use:
http://svn.gnome.org/svn/gtk-web/trunk/
and forget about the rest.
> * I don't know too much how web technologies work but I expected that
> if I open trunk/index.html I should see a page similar to that found
> in www.gtk.org, but in svn's html, there's no left-hand table and no
> pictures for example.
server side includes:
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/de/howto/ssi.html
> * I see www.gtk.org (dated Dec 2006) hasn't been updated to latest svn
> (dated Jan 2007).
yes, that's because our scripts still need to be moved to SVN.
working on that.
---
ciaoTJ
_______________________________________________
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
