On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 21:36 +0100, Mathias Hasselmann wrote: > Am Sonntag, den 08.02.2009, 21:04 +0100 schrieb Murray Cumming: > > On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 18:47 +0100, Mathias Hasselmann wrote: > > > Am Sonntag, den 08.02.2009, 18:36 +0100 schrieb Murray Cumming: > > > > On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 14:51 +0100, Sven Herzberg wrote: > > > > > AFAIR, you can flip it of you create a GtkBox/GtkScale, but not if you > > > > > create a Gtk[HV]{Box,Scale}... Mitch? > > > > > > > > Ah. Were those base classes (GtkBox, etc) instantiable before? > > > > > > > > If the base classes can now already do everything then shouldn't the V/H > > > > classes be deprecated already? > > > > A deprecation doesn't force people to change anything. It's not (yet) a > > removal of the API, though I guess that is planned for the future. It is > > a useful hint and it explains the apparent duplication. > > Still you have to react on deprecations better soon than later, if you > want to avoid drowning some day.
Yes, but surely that decision has been made already by the addition of GtkOrientable? > Oh, from reading this thread I thought this would be the case, but > apparently it is not. Seems you really can change the orientation of > some Gtk[HV]Box now. Shocking. Actually Christian Dywan says they can't flip. But I still think they are meant (by the developers who made the change) to be deprecated so that isn't very relevant anyway. -- Murray Cumming murr...@murrayc.com www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list