[...] >> > > > > If the base classes can now already do everything then shouldn't the >> > > > > V/H >> > > > > classes be deprecated already?
Gtk[VH]Foo deprecation++ from me, yes it should be deprecated if it doesnt serve a purpose - hardcoding the orientation IMO does not serve a purpose at all. Somebody made a really rediculous comment about users switching to QT because of a simple deprecation, MAYBE they have grounds now with a stripped 3.0 in sight, my opinion ? deprecate everything useless you can before that deadline, because we may be stuck with the same crap for another 3+ years. Im sorry if I sound harsh, I dont even personally maintain GTK+ and I have personally HAD IT with outside pressure on the GTK+ team to be so backward forward and 4th dimentionally compatible - the deprecations have been comming for a while - if users switch to QT it will at least give us a couple years peace so that we can at least develop some features and do some real refactoring. Have a little solidarity, we write GTK+, it says it even in every source file, it is provided AS IS, take it or leave it - people use GTK+ because it rocks - it wont rock for long if we cant refactor, do the math. I am on a half hour lunch break... have to run Laters folks, -Tristan _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list