On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Emmanuele Bassi <eba...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, 2011-02-17 at 09:43 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote: > >> The current state of affairs cannot be useful for anybody. > > let's also look at the state of Atk's API, and what's required to do to > create an ATK implementation. when I looked at the accessible > implementations in GtkSpinner and GtkSwitch I was shocked at the > verbosity and roundabout way you have to go to implement an AtkObject.
Yeah, while looking at that, I idly wondered if anybody actually _ever_ tried switching registries at runtime (which the code claims to support with that kind of setup), and what the outcome was.... _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
