From: Matthias Clasen <matthias.cla...@gmail.com> > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Piñeiro <apinhe...@igalia.com> wrote: > >> 1 of 4 is failing. Could you elaborate why this theorical points have >> "failed miserably"? > > In my view, keeping the a11y implementation in their separate module > ghetto is a failure in terms of maintenance, performance, and > robustness. We just don't have a marvellously working accessible > desktop...
Ok, thanks for the explanation. Anyway, just in case, Im not arguing in order to maintain the current status quo. I also think that having the accessibility support as a isolated loadable plugin has more drawbacks that advantages, and on a ideal world it would be on gtk itself since the beginning, and that was a good thing for clutter. Just stating that just make the movement could mean a considerable effort. And as the main reason of lacking the marvellously working accessible desktop was the lack of a constant workforce, just guessing where we should put the effort. BR === API (apinhe...@igalia.com) _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
