Implementing a11y interface in the widget itself may require a big change in atk as API pointed out. So maybe we can move the gail code into gtk first and do the further integration later.
Li On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 1:27 AM, Matthias Clasen <matthias.cla...@gmail.com>wrote: > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Piñeiro <apinhe...@igalia.com> wrote: > > > > > So probably we could study that. Anyway, in the same way, right now I > > don't see how this would better that the option proposed by Matthias. > > Oh, I think having the option of implementing the a11y interface in > the widget itself would be great for many of the simple cases. > For the complex widgets, we'll probably always have separate objects > anyway. > _______________________________________________ > gnome-accessibility-devel mailing list > gnome-accessibility-de...@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-devel >
_______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
