On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Milan Bouchet-Valat <nalimi...@club.fr> wrote: > Le mardi 06 septembre 2011 à 16:34 -0700, John Ralls a écrit : >> It's not a fork of Gtk+ (yet, though on days like this one I get >> really tempted). I actually revived the gtk-osx project on SF; the >> previous version was an actual fork of Gtk1. > So let's improve things a step more, and completely merge the project. > Sounds like the natural end of the story. :-) > >> As I explained earlier, the changes *are* patches, they *are* attached >> to bugs in Bugzilla, and Kris Reitveld *has* promised to review them. >> When he has had time to do so and they have been polished to his high >> standards, they will be committed into mainline. > If you need Kris to review your patches before committing them to > mainline, then the usual way is to have a branch in the GTK git > repository, and rebase it into master when it's accepted. That's much > easier for everybody, much better than putting them on a different repo.
To clarify this, the branch is already in the GTK+ git repo and not on SF. As John has mentioned, all patches are attached to bugs in Bugzilla, which I prefer above digging through a branch to find the changes. regards, -kris. _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
