On Tue, 2013-07-02 at 10:44 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Tristan Van Berkom <t...@gnome.org> wrote: > > > > > Besides what Bastian already points out, I have another concern if we > > are to consider moving > > away from stock items completely. > > > > The document above points to this list of icon names: > > > > http://standards.freedesktop.org/icon-naming-spec/icon-naming-spec-latest.html#names > > > > What guarantees do we have that referring to an icon name in the "icon > > naming spec" will > > actually produce an icon ? > > GTK+ ships with a built-in icon theme that covers the named icons used > by the stock system (not all listed in the naming spec).
Will we keep those: https://developer.gnome.org/gtk3/3.4/gtk3-Stock-Items.html somehow listed in the documentation (even if the declarations are deprecated)? _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list