hi; On 13 September 2013 11:33, Matthew Brush <mbr...@codebrainz.ca> wrote:
> I certainly don't assume that automatically, but when massive deprecations > are made presumably without any prior discussion (at least on any public > GTK+ channels) discussions these days tend to happen on high bandwidth channels (hackfest, conferences, public IRC channels), because mailing lists have proven, time and again, to be poor venues of communication, especially when it comes to time-sensitive development. all invested parties should really consider joining the #gtk+ IRC channel, if you're not there already. > and then feedback is asked for and a number of important > issues are raised and nothing is done about it, or even responding to some > of the issues, just ignoring the thread for 2 months now ... what can be > assumed? the thread is not ignored — it just happened to be between GUADEC and a bunch of people going on holiday. it's still routinely discussed on IRC, for instance. Murray has been very good at filing bugs. if there are *concrete* issues in porting code from the stock system to the named icons, or from GtkAction/GtkUIManager to GAction/GtkBuilder, then filing bugs with *actionable items* is the quickest way to get feedback. ciao, Emmanuele. -- W: http://www.emmanuelebassi.name B: http://blogs.gnome.org/ebassi/ _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
