> > The following will give you an overview over current nomenclature and > your suggestions: > > Current name New name > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > gnet_fi_t (gnet.h) gnut_download_atom_t > -- gnut_server_atom_t > gnet_fi_info (gnet.h) gnut_download_t > gnet_search_t (gnet.h) gnut_query_atom_t > > struct download (download.h) gnut_download_source_t > <-- this is not in gnet.h because downloads have not been split into > gui/core parts! > > Essentially: > - what you call "sources" is "downloads" in gtkg. > - what you call "downloads" is "fileinfo" in gtkg. > > I suggest that you stick to this nomenclature and read the source more > carefully. If you start changing this nomenclature unless you have fully > understood how gtkg works internally, you will end up in big big > trouble.
Thanks, I guess I wasn't fully aware of this relationship. Now that it is stated it makes sense to me and is a good nomenclature. I appologize. > When you take the time to actually read gnet.h, you will also see that > for most datastructures there are two structs, e.g.: > > Finally: if you would like me to shut up and just let you people do, > tell me. No, that doesn't help anything or anyone, you have worked with the code and are more familiar with it, than me. I suppose, I posted that little snippet because I had a feeling I was going off in a bad direction and needed a little guidance, thanks. ~Russ
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
