Am Sonntag, 18. September 2005 00:50 schrieb Raphael Manfredi: > I had to halt the community-sponsored vserver we have today: we reached the > 30 GB/month bandwidth limit. > > I had to stop the GWC on the 7th, because we already had eaten 24 GB of > traffic, leaving only the UHC running. 11 days later, we ate the remaining > 6 GB with the UHC traffic. > > Next month, I will restart the vserver but disable the GWC forever, leaving > only the UHC running. > > Later on, when the GTKG-specific bootstrap server protocol is designed, > I'll run it on that vserver in parallel of the UHC. But today, one must > face the fact that there's way too much traffic directed to GWCs due to > abuse by careless vendors whose servents go wild and query over and > over.... > > Hence my proposol for a closed GTKG-specific bootstrapping server, whose > cache would be filled by the UHC (hence my wish to use GhostWhiteCrab here, > in UHC-mode + GTKG-mode, but with GWC turned off).
If there is a real need for GWC servers I could run one on my server (it's a celeron 2,4 GHz, 512 MB, 100MBit connection to several backbones, located in Berlin / Germany, running Linux 2.6). Around 100 GB traffic per month would not be a problem. The machine not under heavy load (always < 1) . If never run such a server before, so I need some time to evaluate if it's really not causing any problems. Interested? Florian ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php _______________________________________________ Gtk-gnutella-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtk-gnutella-devel
