Christian Biere wrote: > > Actually, the logic I favoured is: all leaves MUST support QRT > > (by definition of a leaf node),
I think this is even more important for ultrapeers. If the ultrapeer doesn't support it, it's a safe bet the implementation is either fairly unfinished, outdated or just piss-poor > If you want to save work and time, you can simply send a QRP with all > slots filled. That will actually cause much more traffic and trouble > when the Ultrapeer merges this with its QRT. Another option is of course to claim being an ultrapeer since it does not have to send a QRP at all. In my opinion, a poor leaf is less of a problem than a poor ultrapeer. -- Christian
pgpncjrbOakQd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
