On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 23:33 +0100, Christian Biere wrote: > Alex Bennee wrote: > > I've been tracking GTKG for a while now via anonymous CVS and its > > been getting more and more painful. Today I can't access it at all > > (I assume this is a SF.net issue). > > > How is its performance for the developers with ssh access? > > > Is it time to think about maybe moving the hosting of the source > > tree or someway of making the development process easier for us > > casual developers that like to track the development tree but don't > > need commit to the repositary? > > You can request a migration to Subversion: > https://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=31070&group_id=1
Well not being a developer I probably couldn't ;-) However is Subversion a solution? I was under the impression the problem with CVS was not one of functionality but one of capacity. Do SF's svn servers offer better service? Quoth the FM "Speed: While we are taking all efforts to ensure our infrastructure is configured optimally, SVN is not as fast as CVS. This difference shouldn't affect most users doing normal daily operations in any meaningful way." > -- Alex, homepage: http://www.bennee.com/~alex/ I try to keep an open mind, but not so open that my brains fall out. -- Judge Harold T. Stone ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Gtk-gnutella-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtk-gnutella-devel
