Alex Bennee wrote: > On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 23:33 +0100, Christian Biere wrote: > > > Is it time to think about maybe moving the hosting of the source > > > tree or someway of making the development process easier for us > > > casual developers that like to track the development tree but don't > > > need commit to the repositary?
> > You can request a migration to Subversion: > > https://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=31070&group_id=1 > Well not being a developer I probably couldn't ;-) You could ask a project admin. > However is Subversion a solution? I was under the impression the problem > with CVS was not one of functionality but one of capacity. Do SF's svn > servers offer better service? There are no different SVN servers for anonymous users and developers. This means there will be no time lack. Everybody has access the latest sources. The CVS servers for developers at SourceForge fail very rarely and I don't expect this to be worse with SVN. Moving to a different service provider would be much more work and I also doubt that others are as reliable as SourceForge. Maybe you should just ask for CVS commit access. More than half of the project members are virtually or plain inactive. So one person more should really be no problem. I don't think there's a large queue of potential contributors anyway. -- Christian
pgppWvC2EotSD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
