On 12-12-19 01:28 PM, Behdad Esfahbod wrote: > On 12-12-18 11:52 PM, John Ralls wrote: >> What can we do to make it better still? Well, I think using XDG variables >> instead of private ones would be an improvement. Does all of this gyrating >> with text files listing the modules really get us anything, or would it be >> less trouble to just go to the modules directory and load everything in it? > > With HarfBuzz now in place, I'm thinking about completely removing the module > machinery. You know what? Lets do it. Who volunteers to rip out another > 1000 lines?
We just need to make sure pangox-compat is updated to keep working. I probably look into this during the holidays. Nothing more relaxing than ripping code out. -- behdad http://behdad.org/ _______________________________________________ gtk-i18n-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-i18n-list
