On Dec 19, 2012, at 10:28 AM, Behdad Esfahbod <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 12-12-18 11:52 PM, John Ralls wrote: >> What can we do to make it better still? Well, I think using XDG variables >> instead of private ones would be an improvement. Does all of this gyrating >> with text files listing the modules really get us anything, or would it be >> less trouble to just go to the modules directory and load everything in it? > > With HarfBuzz now in place, I'm thinking about completely removing the module > machinery. You know what? Lets do it. Who volunteers to rip out another > 1000 lines? > > Owen, any objections? I was actually thinking about that last night. I'm in favor: That code gets loaded anyway, there's no practical way to select what gets loaded, so might as well make it a shared library and link it directly at start up. Regards, John Ralls _______________________________________________ gtk-i18n-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-i18n-list
