On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 12:11 AM, Kevin Ryde <use...@zip.com.au> wrote: > Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeeti...@gmx.de> writes: >> >> The other method, Gtk2::Style::get_property(), also clashes with >> Glib::Object. The question is whether this is acceptable in the same >> way as it is acceptable for Gtk2::TreeModel::get(), >> ... >> >> I think it would make sense to let Gtk2::Style::get() >> and get_property() be the same method > > Actually, letting get_property shadow the GObject method is a bit unlike > TreeModel. With the treemodels the get() varies but you can you can > confidently use get_property() for the object properties in whatever > generic code might operate on Glib::Object descendants. > > How about leaving get_property as the GObject property accessor and give > the style accessor another name?
But which name? This has to be picked with care because a subsequent release of GTK could introduce new methods. I was thinking of using something like get_style_property. This name seems unique enough, after all what are the odds of seeing gtk_style_get_style_property land in GTK? If you don't mind I will wait until we have reached a consensus until a submit a next patch for this last module. -- Emmanuel Rodriguez _______________________________________________ gtk-perl-list mailing list gtk-perl-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-perl-list
