Is an intermediary release planned for gtk# 2.x to fix the g_thread_support issue?
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 3:54 AM, Lluis Sanchez Gual <[email protected]> wrote: > > El 30/07/2012, a las 18:36, Bertrand Lorentz <[email protected]> > escribió: > > Hi Mike, > > Thanks for sharing your thoughts. Some comments below. > > On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Mike Kestner <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Bertrand, > > On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 8:01 AM, Bertrand Lorentz > <[email protected]> wrote: > > When I tried to run the Banshee GTK3 branch, the main issue I hit was > in fact a regression in GTK+ itself: > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=679232 > I guess it's a good sign about the state of the bindings themselves. ;) > > > I think the binding itself is in pretty good shape, and has been for a > while now. There were a few tweaks needed for the Banshee port. MD > would be another good test, but I doubt you will talk anyone into a v3 > port of it. > > > That is also my impression after talking to a few MD guys. The > cost/benefit is just not there for them. > > > Our current plan is to incrementally migrate MD to XWT > (https://github.com/mono/xwt), since it will allow us to run MD using the > native widgets in each platform we support. All we need then is a GTK# 3 > backend for XWT. > > Lluis. > > > _______________________________________________ > Gtk-sharp-list maillist - [email protected] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/gtk-sharp-list > _______________________________________________ Gtk-sharp-list maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/gtk-sharp-list
