Hi Jens, Andy, On May 7, 2010, at 7:17, Andy Stewart wrote:
> Hi Jens, > > Jens Petersen <peter...@haskell.org> writes: > >> On 5 May 2010 21:50, Andy Stewart <lazycat.mana...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> For demos under "gtk2hs/demo", we need move "gstreamer" to >>> "gstreamer/demo", and move rest demos to "gtk/demo" >> >> Or alternatively making "gtk2hs/demo" into a separate "gtk2hs-demos" >> cabal package say >> might be better and more portable? >> >> Well personally I don't mind - just an idea that occurred to me >> this morning. :) > Because all gtk2hs packages will split, so make demo along with it's > package better than split demo, then user don't need find those demo. > > BTW, we don't compile demo default, so it's not matter portable. I think we should compile all demos by default but not install them. You can specify that with cabal. However, I don't know if you can build an executable in a cabal file that depends on the library that is being built in the cabal file. If that doesn't work, we need to come up with a new solution. > Thanks for your suggestion, we will consider this. One thing that's a bit odd or wrong now it that demos like the profile viewer is now bundled with glade just because it's user interface was done in glade. However, it's really a demo application in itself, independent from glade. I think we should leave the demos bundled with the libraries for now. We can change this later. Axel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Gtk2hs-devel mailing list Gtk2hs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtk2hs-devel
