On 26.01.2014, at 08:23, Donald Allen <donaldcal...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Ok, let's remove this assertion and any other assertion that you think is 
>> out-of-place. If this does not affect all callbacks, then maybe we can have 
>> a comment in the C code saying why the iterators may have a different time 
>> stamp so that people don't put the assertion back in if they eyeball the 
>> code in the future.
>> 
>> Can you send a patch?
> 
> I don't understand why you need a patch from me. I have no opinion
> about any assertions other than the one I tripped over and I've said
> that I think it should be removed and you've agreed. It's a one line
> delete. Why do you need a patch?
> 

Ok, I thought there might be other assertions that you think should not be 
there. I'm sure we can remove just that one assertion ourselves.

Cheers,
Axel

> /Don
> 
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Axel
>> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services.
Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For
Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between.
Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Gtk2hs-devel mailing list
Gtk2hs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtk2hs-devel

Reply via email to