Hi,
I have a scenario here where there is a GtkAdjustment owned by a C gtk widget and a Gtkmm gets the adjustment and then wraps it in a Gtkmm wrapper. The wrapper should pass copy=true because it isn't the owner of the underlying GtkObject. However, what I observe is that the wrapper is created and it increments the adjustment's refcount as expected but when the wrapper dies, it does not decrement the refcount, and it calls gtk_object_destroy which seems incorrect. Because the other ref holders aren't expecting destroy to be called, they do not release their refs and the object ends up being leaked when the other ref olders do release their refs because there is still a +1 thanks to the wrapper.
On the other hand, if I pass copy=false, it doesn't touch the refcount at all and calls gtk_object_destroy when the wrapper dies as you'd expect.
Is there a bug here or am I just expecting the wrong semantics?
--phil _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
