On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 13:03 -0800, Philip Langdale wrote: > Hi, > > I have a scenario here where there is a GtkAdjustment owned by > a C gtk widget and a Gtkmm gets the adjustment and then wraps it > in a Gtkmm wrapper. The wrapper should pass copy=true because it > isn't the owner of the underlying GtkObject. However, what I > observe is that the wrapper is created and it increments the > adjustment's refcount as expected but when the wrapper dies, it > does not decrement the refcount, and it calls gtk_object_destroy > which seems incorrect. Because the other ref holders aren't > expecting destroy to be called, they do not release their refs > and the object ends up being leaked when the other ref olders > do release their refs because there is still a +1 thanks to > the wrapper. > > On the other hand, if I pass copy=false, it doesn't touch the > refcount at all and calls gtk_object_destroy when the wrapper > dies as you'd expect. > > Is there a bug here or am I just expecting the wrong semantics?
If you tell us exactly what function you are talking about then we can investigate. A test case would be even better. -- Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
