On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 4:25 PM, Tobias Mueller <mue...@cryptobitch.de> wrote: > On Sat, 2017-10-21 at 19:41 +0200, Alexandre Franke wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Tobias Mueller <muelli@cryptobitch.d >> e> wrote: >> As far as I know, the schedule format was defined by Pentabarf and >> nowadays many other applications implement it > Including OSEM? ;-)
Yes. Sorry, I should have mentioned it. ☺ > I consider this good reasoning. > FWIW: I didn't intend to recommend one software or advise against > another. But rather refute statements that I believe are wrong in order > to help making a better decision. I assumed that was one of the things > the original message intended to provoke. 👍 > You seem to be all set More or less, the question of the hosting and sysadmin is still in the air. > but if you're looking for suggestions as to what > features your software should have, I recommend ranking a static export > high on your list of things to look out for. Not only will it make > deployment much easier, but it will also make archiving the whole thing > very easy. Agreed, this is important. I don’t know if OSEM already does it. I’ll check and ask for this feature if it’s not already present. > Because GNOME.Asia Summit didn't use OSEM for the last couple of years. Oh. I’ll get in touch with the OSEM people to check why they claim we did. -- Alexandre Franke GNOME Hacker & Foundation Director _______________________________________________ guadec-list mailing list guadec-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/guadec-list
