h1 a:hover {background-color:#888;color:#fff ! important;}
div#emailbody table#itemcontentlist tr td div ul {
list-style-type:square; padding-left:1em; } div#emailbody
table#itemcontentlist tr td div blockquote { padding-left:6px;
border-left: 6px solid #dadada; margin-left:1em; } div#emailbody
table#itemcontentlist tr td div li { margin-bottom:1em;
margin-left:1em; } table#itemcontentlist tr td a:link,
table#itemcontentlist tr td a:visited, table#itemcontentlist tr td
a:active, ul#summarylist li a { color:#000033; font-weight:bold;
text-decoration:none; } img {border:none;} The latest from
thesportreview.com

Goal-line technology moves a step closer as Fifa begins tests

Posted: 04 Feb 2011 03:49 PM PST


Fifa has confirmed it will test 10 goal-line technology systems next
week ahead of a meeting of football’s lawmakers in March.
The results of the experiments, which will take place behind closed
doors at Fifa’s headquarters in Zurich between 7-13 February, will be
presented to the International Football Association Board (IFAB) when
it meets in Wales next month for its annual review of the sport’s laws.

Should the IFAB approve the principle of goal-line technology the next
step would be an experimental phase in selected competitions.

The governing body requires each proposed system to prove that it is
100 per cent accurate and that it can confirm the decision to officials
automatically within a second.

Goal-line technology was put back on the IFAB’s agenda following two
major refereeing gaffes at the 2010 World Cup in South Africa,
including England midfielder Frank Lampard’s ‘goal’ against Germany
that was not awarded.

Despite being a self-confessed advocate for human judgement, Fifa
president Sepp Blatter admitted it would be “a nonsense not to reopen
the file” on technology following the recent incidents and referred the
matter to the IFAB.

Uefa president Michel Platini remains against the introduction of
technology and is convinced his alternative system of an additional
assistant referee behind each goal is sufficient.

“With additional referees you don’t need goal-line technology,” said
Platini. “If you want to put goal-line technology in place, it will be
for maybe one or two cases every five years. I want more justice but I
want human justice, using human eyes.”

Other issues to be raised at the IFAB meeting next month include a
proposed ban on players wearing snoods on the grounds of heath and
safety and the possibility of equipping referees with “vanishing spray”
to mark where defensive walls should stand.
The IFAB’s agreed principles for goal-line technology
• The technology would apply solely to the goal line, and only to
determine whether a goal has been scored or not

• The system must be accurate

• The indication of whether a goal has been scored must be immediate
and automatically confirmed within one second

• The indication of whether a goal has been scored will only be
communicated to the match officials
You are subscribed to email updates from The Sport Review
To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. Email delivery
powered by Google Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610

--
Posted By Mas Item Arekjowo to The Sport Review at 2/04/2011 11:19:00 PM

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Gugukluhayat" group.
To post to this group, send email to gugukluhayat@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
gugukluhayat+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/gugukluhayat?hl=en.

Cevap