[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Hi, > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > >> Two possibilities to fix it: >> >> 1. Copy `srcprop.[ch]' and `eval.c' bits from HEAD to 1.8. After all, >> it's probably solid enough (I use almost only HEAD). See [0] for >> an overview of the initial patch. It doesn't break the public API >> nor the ABI, but it (re)moves stuff from the `srcprop.h'. >> >> 2. Remove the critical section from 1.8 and synchronize accesses to >> `srcprops_freelist' with a private mutex, assuming that's a correct >> fix.
I prefer (1). > The second approach is actually wrong: we'd need to acquire a mutex in > `srcprops_free ()' to synchronize accesses to `srcprops_freelist', but > we can't do it since `srcprops_free ()' is called during GC---which is > why there was a critical section in the first place I suppose. > > Thus the first approach seems unavoidable. Attached is the exact patch. > It removes non-public macros and data types from `srcprop.h', which is > acceptable IMO. > > OK to apply? Basically yes, but two thoughts: - Can I just take a couple more days to review the srcprops changes in detail? It's important for my debugging work, and I recall having some concern when Han-Wen implemented this... Looking at the diffs quickly again now, I can't see any reason for that concern, but I'd like to be sure. - Although I agree in principle that all those macros shouldn't be in srcprop.h, do we really need to make that change now? I think we can just apply Han-Wen's changes to the macros in srcprop.h, without moving them to srcprop.c. Regards, Neil