On Sat 27 Nov 2010 01:08, Andreas Rottmann <a.rottm...@gmx.at> writes:
> [ It's off-topic in this thread, but I think the circular dependencies > introduced by using `@' and `@@' in the R6RS modules should at one > point be eliminated; they work almost all the time, but can fail in > surprising ways -- see the commit comment of c0f6c163... ] Agreed, FWIW; to the extent that it's possible anyway. For me it's also fine to have auxiliary modules in the rnrs namespace, if needed to break cycles. Andy -- http://wingolog.org/
