Andy Wingo <wi...@pobox.com> writes:

> On Sat 27 Nov 2010 01:08, Andreas Rottmann <a.rottm...@gmx.at> writes:
>
>> [ It's off-topic in this thread, but I think the circular dependencies
>>   introduced by using `@' and `@@' in the R6RS modules should at one
>>   point be eliminated; they work almost all the time, but can fail in
>>   surprising ways -- see the commit comment of c0f6c163... ]
>
> Agreed, FWIW; to the extent that it's possible anyway. For me it's also
> fine to have auxiliary modules in the rnrs namespace, if needed to break
> cycles.
>
I'll look into this when I have some extranous time on my hands; I think
`(rnrs private ...)' seems like a decent choice for modules internal to
the R6RS implementation, although I'm of course open to suggestions.

Regards, Rotty
-- 
Andreas Rottmann -- <http://rotty.yi.org/>

Reply via email to