Andy Wingo <wi...@pobox.com> writes: > On Sat 27 Nov 2010 01:08, Andreas Rottmann <a.rottm...@gmx.at> writes: > >> [ It's off-topic in this thread, but I think the circular dependencies >> introduced by using `@' and `@@' in the R6RS modules should at one >> point be eliminated; they work almost all the time, but can fail in >> surprising ways -- see the commit comment of c0f6c163... ] > > Agreed, FWIW; to the extent that it's possible anyway. For me it's also > fine to have auxiliary modules in the rnrs namespace, if needed to break > cycles. > I'll look into this when I have some extranous time on my hands; I think `(rnrs private ...)' seems like a decent choice for modules internal to the R6RS implementation, although I'm of course open to suggestions.
Regards, Rotty -- Andreas Rottmann -- <http://rotty.yi.org/>