Andy Wingo <[email protected]> skribis: > On Mon 30 Jan 2012 02:04, Mark H Weaver <[email protected]> writes: > >> Andy suggested that we should add these, so here's a patch to do so. >> Okay to push? > > Looks great to me, thanks. Please push.
Can we s/scm_call_varargs/scm_call/ instead? (For consistency with scm_list_n, it would be ‘scm_call_n’, but that one is already taken for something else.) Other than that, OK! Thanks, Ludo’.
