Re: [PATCH] Implement scm_call_varargs and scm_call_{7,8,9}

[Mark H Weaver]

l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Can we s/scm_call_varargs/scm_call/ instead?  (For consistency with
> scm_list_n, it would be ‘scm_call_n’, but that one is already taken for
> something else.)

Excellent suggestion!  'scm_call' it is :)

    Thanks,
      Mark