On Sun 02 Mar 2014 22:13, [email protected] (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > FWIW, I think the approach should rather be to have a special port (a > fluid) for such things, say, ‘current-notification-port’. We’d simply > replace scm_current_error_port by scm_current_notication_port above.
Isn't that the same as current-warning-port? I thought this was one of the use cases for current-warning-port :) Andy -- http://wingolog.org/
