Andy Wingo <[email protected]> skribis: > On Sun 02 Mar 2014 22:13, [email protected] (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > >> FWIW, I think the approach should rather be to have a special port (a >> fluid) for such things, say, ‘current-notification-port’. We’d simply >> replace scm_current_error_port by scm_current_notication_port above. > > Isn't that the same as current-warning-port? I thought this was one of > the use cases for current-warning-port :)
Yeah it’s very similar, but we could want to differentiate between actual warnings and mere notifications. Dunno if it’s important. Ludo’.
