Jonas Hahnfeld <[email protected]> writes: > On Mon, 2025-08-25 at 21:03 +0200, Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: >> Liliypond just had a release again, and it would be great if we could >> get Guile to a point that Lilypond does not have to patch it anymore for >> their Windows-releases. > > We're patching since a long time, but yes it would be great if there > was an upstream release that "just worked" (tm) on 64-bit Windows.
I hope we’ll get there. It’s been my wish for several years now and is the reason why I got push-access on the savannah repo of Guile. >> Are there any regressions caused by the Lilypond patches? > > The refactoring patches should be relatively safe and, as far as I can > remember, the actual changes only take effect if sizeof(long) < > sizeof(void *), which is effectively only the case for 64-bit Windows. That sounds good. @Mike: would it be OK for you if I first created a PR for these so that you’d base your changes on top of them? Best wishes, Arne -- Unpolitisch sein heißt politisch sein, ohne es zu merken. draketo.de
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
