Hi, I like the request.
I think the dependent packages should be pointed to. In this way, each node in the graph and its outgoing arrows reflect the contents of a single package. ~Malco > -----Original Message----- > From: guix-devel-bounces+mec=stowers....@gnu.org [mailto:guix-devel- > bounces+mec=stowers....@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Ludovic Courtès > Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2015 3:47 PM > To: Andreas Enge <andr...@enge.fr> > Cc: Guix-devel <Guix-devel@gnu.org> > Subject: Re: New ‘guix graph’ command > > Hey! > > Andreas Enge <andr...@enge.fr> skribis: > > > Very neat indeed! A tiny bit of nitpicking: Would it not be preferable > > if the arrows were reversed, from the inputs to the dependent packages? > > Dunno, maybe the graph people would choose the other direction but I like it > this way, looks more “intuitive” to me. What do people think? > > Ludo’.
