guix-devel  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Thanos Apollo
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not André Batista
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not pinoaffe
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not André Batista
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Ian Eure
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Andreas Enge
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not bokr
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Janneke Nieuwenhuizen
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Divya Ranjan Pattanaik
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Ian Eure
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Ian Eure
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Ian Eure
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Greg Hogan
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Ian Eure
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Greg Hogan
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Ian Eure
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Noé Lopez
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Yarl
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Greg Hogan
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Greg Hogan
  • Re: Including LLM output in Guix Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Including LLM output in Guix Greg Hogan
  • Re: Including LLM output in Guix Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Including LLM output in Guix Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Including LLM output in Guix Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Including LLM output in Guix Tomas Volf
  • Re: Including LLM output in Guix Greg Hogan
  • Re: Including LLM output in Guix Ludovic Courtès
  • Re: Including LLM output in Guix Greg Hogan
  • Re: Including LLM output in Guix Ludovic Courtès
  • Re: Including LLM output in Guix Greg Hogan
  • Re: Including LLM output in Guix Pjotr Prins
  • Re: Including LLM output in Guix pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Greg Hogan
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Greg Hogan
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not pinoaffe
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Greg Hogan
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Greg Hogan
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Kristoffer Ström
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Vagrant Cascadian
  • Re: Package Updates and additions should mentions if LLM is used in the software or not Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
• Re: Deliberation of GCD 006 Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
  • Re: Deliberation of GCD 006 Andreas Enge
  • Re: Deliberation of GCD 006 Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
  • Re: Deliberation of GCD 006 Ludovic Courtès
  • Re: Deliberation of GCD 006 Peter Polidoro
  • Re: Deliberation of GCD 006 宋文武
  • Re: Deliberation of GCD 006 Andreas Enge
• Confusion about guile versions; which one should I use? Tomas Volf
  • Re: Confusion about guile versions; which one should I use? Ludovic Courtès
  • Re: Confusion about guile versions; which one should I use? Tomas Volf
• One bug per day... Andreas Enge
  • Re: One bug per day... Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: One bug per day... Andreas Enge
• [GCD007] Deliberation Period: Teams, Special Teams and Memberships Simon Tournier
  • Re: [GCD007] Deliberation Period: Teams, Special Teams and Memberships Greg Hogan
  • Re: [GCD007] Deliberation Period: Teams, Special Teams and Memberships Noé Lopez
  • Re: [GCD007] Deliberation Period: Teams, Special Teams and Memberships Greg Hogan
  • Re: [GCD007] Deliberation Period: Teams, Special Teams and Memberships Vagrant Cascadian
  • Re: [GCD007] Deliberation Period: Teams, Special Teams and Memberships Greg Hogan
  • Re: [GCD007] Deliberation Period: Teams, Special Teams and Memberships Simon Tournier
  • Re: [GCD007] Deliberation Period: Teams, Special Teams and Memberships Greg Hogan
  • Re: [GCD007] Deliberation Period: Teams, Special Teams and Memberships Maxim Cournoyer
  • Re: [GCD007] Deliberation Period: Teams, Special Teams and Memberships pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
  • Re: [GCD007] Deliberation Period: Teams, Special Teams and Memberships Gabriel Wicki
  • Re: [GCD007] Deliberation Period: Teams, Special Teams and Memberships Andreas Enge
  • Re: [GCD007] Deliberation Period: Teams, Special Teams and Memberships Noé Lopez
  • Re: [GCD007] Deliberation Period: Teams, Special Teams and Memberships Laurent Gatto
  • Re: [GCD007] Deliberation Period: Teams, Special Teams and Memberships Giacomo Leidi
  • Re: [GCD007] Deliberation Period: Teams, Special Teams and Memberships Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: [GCD007] Deliberation Period: Teams, Special Teams and Memberships Janneke Nieuwenhuizen
  • Re: [GCD007] Deliberation Period: Teams, Special Teams and Memberships Simon Tournier
  • Result GCD007: withdrawn (Teams, Special Teams and Memberships) Simon Tournier
  • Re: Result GCD007: withdrawn (Teams, Special Teams and Memberships) Greg Hogan
  • Re: Result GCD007: withdrawn (Teams, Special Teams and Memberships) Simon Tournier
  • Re: Result GCD007: withdrawn (Teams, Special Teams and Memberships) Greg Hogan
  • Re: Result GCD007: withdrawn (Teams, Special Teams and Memberships) Simon Tournier
  • Re: Result GCD007: withdrawn—or is it? Rutherther
  • Re: Result GCD007: withdrawn—or is it? Greg Hogan
  • Re: Result GCD007: withdrawn—or is it? Simon Tournier
  • Re: Result GCD007: withdrawn—or is it? Andreas Enge
  • Re: Result GCD007: withdrawn—or is it? Simon Tournier
  • Re: Result GCD007: withdrawn—or is it? Simon Tournier
  • Re: Result GCD007: withdrawn—or is it? Rutherther
  • Re: Result GCD007: withdrawn—or is it? Simon Tournier
  • Re: Result GCD007: withdrawn—or is it? Simon Tournier
  • Re: Result GCD007: withdrawn—or is it? Greg Hogan
  • Git error when pushing Result GCD007: withdrawn (Teams, Special Teams and Memberships) Simon Tournier
  • Re: Git error when pushing Result GCD007: withdrawn (Teams, Special Teams and Memberships) Christopher Baines
  • Re: Result GCD007: withdrawn—or is it? Rutherther
  • Re: Result GCD007: withdrawn—or is it? Rutherther
  • Re: Result GCD007: withdrawn—or endless debates? Vagrant Cascadian
  • Re: Result GCD007: withdrawn—or endless debates? indieterminacy
  • Re: Result GCD007: withdrawn—answering the plea to finally shut up nevertheless Simon Tournier
  • Re: Result GCD007: withdrawn—answering the plea to finally shut up nevertheless Maxim Cournoyer
  • Re: [GCD007] Deliberation Period: Teams, Special Teams and Memberships Cayetano Santos
• What's the current state of packaging jquery? Daniel Littlewood
• Clearity on the scope of package licenses Sughosha
  • Re: Clearity on the scope of package licenses Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Clearity on the scope of package licenses Sughosha
  • Re: Clearity on the scope of package licenses Maxim Cournoyer
  • Re: Clearity on the scope of package licenses Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Clearity on the scope of package licenses Maxim Cournoyer
  • Re: Clearity on the scope of package licenses Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Clearity on the scope of package licenses Maxim Cournoyer
  • Re: Clearity on the scope of package licenses Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Clearity on the scope of package licenses Maxim Cournoyer
  • Re: Clearity on the scope of package licenses Sughosha
• Monorepo vs multiple microchannels for the official Guix stuff Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
• Welcome to our latest new committer, Noé! Maxim Cournoyer
  • Re: Welcome to our latest new committer, Noé! Janneke Nieuwenhuizen
  • Re: Welcome to our latest new committer, Noé! Ada Stevenson
  • Re: Welcome to our latest new committer, Noé! Ludovic Courtès
  • Re: Welcome to our latest new committer, Noé! Noé Lopez
  • Re: Welcome to our latest new committer, Noé! Rodion Goritskov
• Fan games in Guix Sughosha
• Guix at Capitole du Libre, Toulouse ? Julien Lepiller
• Criticism of using substitute* Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Criticism of using substitute* Jason Conroy
  • Re: Criticism of using substitute* Ludovic Courtès
  • Re: Criticism of using substitute* Andreas Enge
  • Re: Criticism of using substitute* Ludovic Courtès
  • Re: Criticism of using substitute* Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Criticism of using substitute* Jason Conroy
  • Re: Criticism of using substitute* Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Criticism of using substitute* Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Criticism of using substitute* Jason Conroy
  • Re: Criticism of using substitute* Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Criticism of using substitute* Jason Conroy
  • Re: Criticism of using substitute* Jason Conroy
  • Re: Criticism of using substitute* Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Criticism of using substitute* Jason Conroy
  • Re: Criticism of using substitute* Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Criticism of using substitute* Jason Conroy
  • Re: Criticism of using substitute* Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Criticism of using substitute* Andreas Enge
  • Re: Criticism of using substitute* Jason Conroy
  • Re: Criticism of using substitute* Andreas Enge
  • Re: Criticism of using substitute* Andreas Enge
  • Re: Criticism of using substitute* Jason Conroy
  • Re: Criticism of using substitute* Ludovic Courtès
  • Re: Criticism of using substitute* Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Criticism of using substitute* Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Criticism of using substitute* Tomas Volf
  • Re: Criticism of using substitute* Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Criticism of using substitute* Ludovic Courtès
  • Re: Criticism of using substitute* Maxim Cournoyer
  • Re: Criticism of using substitute* Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Criticism of using substitute* Maxim Cournoyer
  • Re: Criticism of using substitute* Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Criticism of using substitute* Kaelyn
  • Re: Criticism of using substitute* Maxim Cournoyer
• Upgrade gpg to 2.5.x branch? Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: Upgrade gpg to 2.5.x branch? Cayetano Santos
• Guix London meetup Arun Isaac
• GCD 006: Deliberation starts Andreas Enge
  • Re: GCD 006: Deliberation starts Simon Tournier
  • Re: GCD 006: Deliberation starts Maxim Cournoyer
  • Re: GCD 006: Deliberation starts Nicolas Goaziou
  • Re: GCD 006: Deliberation starts Jason Conroy
  • Re: GCD 006: Deliberation starts Greg Hogan
  • Re: GCD 006: Deliberation starts pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
  • Re: GCD 006: Deliberation starts Noé Lopez
  • Re: GCD 006: Deliberation starts Giacomo Leidi
  • Re: GCD 006: Deliberation starts Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: GCD 006: Deliberation starts Cayetano Santos
  • Re: GCD 006: Deliberation starts Thanos Apollo
  • Re: GCD 006: Deliberation starts Andreas Enge
  • Re: GCD 006: Deliberation starts Sughosha
  • Re: GCD 006: Deliberation starts Divya Ranjan Pattanaik
  • Re: GCD 006: Deliberation starts Rodion Goritskov
  • Re: GCD 006: Deliberation starts Andreas Enge
  • Re: GCD 006: Deliberation starts Rutherther
  • Re: GCD 006: Deliberation starts Ludovic Courtès
  • Re: GCD 006: Deliberation starts Christopher Baines
  • Re: GCD 006: Deliberation starts Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
  • Re: GCD 006: Deliberation starts Janneke Nieuwenhuizen
  • Re: GCD 006: Deliberation starts Guillaume Le Vaillant
  • Re: GCD 006: Deliberation starts Jonathan Brielmaier

• Earlier messages
• Later messages