On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 10:33:30PM -0600, Eric Bavier wrote: > On Wed, 10 Feb 2016 18:36:48 +0100 > Pjotr Prins <pjotr.publi...@thebird.nl> wrote: > > > * gnu/packages/parallel.scm (slurm-llnl): New variable. > > --- > > gnu/packages/parallel.scm | 51 > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > > 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > [...] > > + (license license:openssl))) > > There are several bits in the 'contribs' directory that seem to not be > under free licenses. E.g. > > - contribs/cray/slurmconfgen_smw.py contains "Copyright 2015 Cray Inc. > All Rights Reserved" > > - contribs/cray/slurmconfgen.py.in contains "Copyright 2013 Cray Inc. > All Rights Reserved" > > - contribs/cray/libalps_test_programs.tar.gz contains a mixture of > GPLv2, public domain, and binaries. > > - contribs/mic/mpirun-mic declares no license. > > - contribs/pmi2 is under a custom (copyleft?) license. > > - contribs/sgather declares no license. > > - contribs/sgi/netloc_to_topology.c contains "Copyright (C) 2014 > Silicon Graphics International Corp. All rights reserved." > > - contribs/sjobexit/sjobexitmod.pl declares no license. > > I don't think we can claim any of these are covered under the same > license as slurm, since the COPYING file explicitely says "Some tools > in the "contribs" directory have other licenses." > > The contribs tools are not installed by default, but we do need to > remove any non-free source from there with an origin snippet. > > Also, I found the DISCLAIMER file contains the "or (at your option) any > later version." verbiage, so the slurm license itself is license:gpl2+
That was hard to find. Initially I had gpl2+ but they don't include the license in the source so I defaulted to the license they include which is openssl. But ja... I agree the rest is a mess but we aren't building contrib. Do you have an example of a package that does this the right way? Pj. --
