Andreas Enge <andr...@enge.fr> writes: > A bit odd indeed, but okay, I think. I would either go with "font-un" and put > everything into it (or keep just the core part and drop the extra part, as you > wish), or "font-un-core" and "font-un-extra" (in two packages, > for instance).
for now I go with font-un and later add the (not part of the package at all, but lying around somewhere else) -extra fonts. >> In general I wonder, can't we use a gentoo:// for mirror and pull >> the font files from there? They have a reasonable distributed >> architecure of servers and to my knowledge no file includes >> patches, the patches are in the portage directories, not the >> distdir directory. >> If there's no gentoo mirror option, maybe we can add that later. > > I do not know how their files are organised. Are they just tarballs? Do the > tarballs have absolute path names (to "/usr" or such)? I will look into that when I have enough time. generally, most are tarballs if I remember correctly. > I think the hosting > options of the tarball you proposed are fine. Maybe also give the location > of the mime-faulty original in a comment (I think Ludovic suggested that), > so if the mirror disappears, we can still find the source somewhere. Yes, see new patch which only has a faulty texinfo markup I need help with. thanks, -- ng irc://loupsycedyglgamf.onion:67/~NiAsterisk https://psyced.org:34443/NiAsterisk/ EDN: https://wiki.c3d2.de/Echt_Dezentrales_Netz/en
