Following later this week: gnunet + gnunet-gtk SVN, co-authored work with Jookia.
I'll ask on gnunet-dev about this, but it might be that we have to decide wether to default to some svn of gnunet, as 0.10.1 is really old. Stable, but old.. Which possibly could affect the experience for people who try to use gnunet now, before any applications like secushare are running on it. plus you need -svn if you want to hack on or testrun application which develop on top of / inside gnunet. Guix should provide a stable experience, but if stable means too old to deliver a useable experience of an still in development network, what do we suggest? I would not replace gnunet and gnunet-gtk, I would just make gnunet-svn the default (gnunet will default to gnunet-svn) and gnunet-0.10.1 will have to be installed explicitly. There are only a few open bugs until the next GNUnet release will be done, but 0.10.1 is just terribly old. what do you think? -- ng irc://loupsycedyglgamf.onion:67/~NiAsterisk https://psyced.org:34443/NiAsterisk/ EDN: https://wiki.c3d2.de/Echt_Dezentrales_Netz/en