On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 03:48:03PM +0100, Nils Gillmann wrote: > Following later this week: > > gnunet + gnunet-gtk SVN, co-authored work with Jookia. > > I'll ask on gnunet-dev about this, but it might be that we have > to decide wether to default to some svn of gnunet, as 0.10.1 is > really old. Stable, but old.. Which possibly could affect the > experience for people who try to use gnunet now, before any > applications like secushare are running on it. plus you need -svn > if you want to hack on or testrun application which develop on > top of / inside gnunet. > > Guix should provide a stable experience, but if stable means too > old to deliver a useable experience of an still in development > network, what do we suggest? I would not replace gnunet and > gnunet-gtk, I would just make gnunet-svn the default (gnunet will > default to gnunet-svn) and gnunet-0.10.1 will have to be > installed explicitly. > There are only a few open bugs until the next GNUnet release will > be done, but 0.10.1 is just terribly old. > > what do you think?
To add on this, the network and executables as of SVN are incompatible with the network as of v0.10.1. This may be a barrier to compatibility. Jookia.
