On 4/3/16, Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> wrote:
> alírio eyng <alirioe...@gmail.com> skribis:
>> On 4/2/16, Eric Bavier <ericbav...@openmailbox.org> wrote:
>>> do we really want
>>> python3 for fontforge if their documentation is introducing users to
>>> python2 syntax and many font packages need python2?
...
> I think we should stay close to what Fontforge developers recommend.
following upstream is good.[1]
i don't think old documentation[2][3] last modified more than five
years ago and created before python3 was released is a recommendation.

[1]"Python 2.x is legacy, Python 3.x is the present and future of the language"
https://wiki.python.org/moin/Python2orPython3
[2]"Created on: 29-Nov-2006"
"Last modified: 30-Nov-2006"
https://github.com/fontforge/fontforge.github.io/blob/master/pythonscripts.html
[3]"Created on: 6-Apr-2007"
"Last modified: 28-Apr-2010"
https://github.com/fontforge/fontforge.github.io/blob/master/python.html

Reply via email to