Danny Milosavljevic <dan...@scratchpost.org> skribis: > On Tue, 30 Aug 2016 11:08:17 +0300 > Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> It would be good if you write a comment before licenses, like what files >> have what licenses. Also is it really 'gpl2'? If the license says "or >> any later version", it should be 'gpl2+'. > > They are:
Based on <http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs//main/m/mtd-utils/mtd-utils_1.5.2-1_copyright>, the combined work seems to be GPLv2+. > GPL2-only parts (which constitute the vast majority) were omitted. Are there GPLv2 license headers that lack the “or any later version” wording, or anything that explicitly says “version 2 only”? If not, it’s v2-or-later. HTH, Ludo’.
