On September 2, 2016 2:51:03 PM GMT+03:00, Ricardo Wurmus <ricardo.wur...@mdc-berlin.de> wrote: > >Efraim Flashner <efr...@flashner.co.il> writes: > >> On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 03:05:34PM -0400, Kei Kebreau wrote: >>> Ricardo Wurmus <rek...@elephly.net> writes: >>> >>> > Kei Kebreau <k...@openmailbox.org> writes: >>> > >>> >> Ricardo Wurmus <rek...@elephly.net> writes: >>> >> >>> >>> Kei Kebreau <k...@openmailbox.org> writes: >>> >>> >>> >>>> Whoops, last patch was a bit messy and stacked on the previous >one. This >>> >>>> patch should be better! >>> >>> >>> >>> I just wanted to push a slightly modified version of this >(attached) but >>> >>> I cannot actually build the package. The patch to remove unused >code >>> >>> does not apply due to different line endings. >>> >>> >>> >>> Could you please take a look at this again and make sure that >the patch >>> >>> to the sources applies? >>> >>> >>> >>> ~~ Ricardo >>> >>> >>> >> I just tried it on my machine, and everything applied and built >>> >> correctly from a clean Guix tree. I don't exactly know how to >proceed >>> >> From here. Perhaps a third party can try to build from the patch? >>> > >>> > The problem might be with the inline patch in the email. Don’t >know. >>> > >>> > ~~ Ricardo >>> >>> I'll try sending it again, for lack of a better plan. If all else >fails >>> I can post it on paste.lisp.org. > >> Hunk #1 FAILED at 139 (different line endings). >[...] >> Hunk #1 FAILED at 47 (different line endings). > >These are the exact same errors I got. Maybe the line endings were >converted automatically when you saved the patch with your editor? > >~~ Ricardo
I opened the mail with mutt, passed the patch to "cd workspace/guix; git am", which is my normal workflow -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
